Hans Peter Kuhn | essay |
The sounds he uses are often manipulated so that their original sources seldom can be recognised. This makes them difficult to describe, which is why Kuhn characterises them as »abstract«. In any case, to him the object is not to hear as many colourful layers as possible from sound as such. The sounds' motion is much more important for him, their rhythmic patterns or their opaque, seemingly networked sequences. The »in-between« of the sounds is paramount. Sounds serve to compose temporal structures. In their rapid sequencing, they span lines along an object or through a space, easily entering into interactions with what is seen.
The visual and acoustic events in his installations quite
frequently occur in distinctly parallel configurations which, however, function
in complementary fashion. They simultaneously structure space and time, and
yet they remain related to specific senses, so they can support each other.
Walls bathed in colour or towers at the water's edge, fluorescent tubes that
outline bridges or overpasses encourage the eye to wander; but from a distance
they merge into a picture in space. If one approaches, although an intervening
distance always exists, one hears the sounds coming from loudspeakers that are
also built in. The sounds are »abstract«; what is important is their
stream, because this plays out the temporal dynamic of the now nearer observing
eye. Nevertheless the visual spatial arrangement lends such temporal occurrences
a formal framework. The sense of hearing stimulates the observing motion of
the wandering eye, the sense of seeing indicates the spatial direction of the
movement being heard.
Hans Peter Kuhn's installations, placed with perfect clarity at their respective
sites and attaining new dimensions in coloured light and moving sound, sometimes
seem to be dreamily hovering. Their technical perfection arouses admiration.
These aesthetic exteriors certainly can stand on their own for unmediated experience.
But a difficult-to-describe perceptual disjunction also arises: it seems as
if static light is set in motion by moving sounds and the observer's standpoint,
too, plays a role, as if the impression relies not only upon automatic perceptual
mechanisms, but also upon the actions of the viewer him/herself.